Skip to content
ClearRoad Guide
Menu
Insurer Reviews

Dairyland SR-22 Review: Eight Companies, One Brand

By Alonso Pinar JiménezPublished July 31, 2026
Dairyland SR-22 Review: Eight Companies, One Brand

Dairyland publishes something almost no insurance brand does: a page listing every company that underwrites its policies, with an NAIC number for each, and then a second list showing which of those companies operates in each of the 51 US jurisdictions. It is the most useful page on the site and it is not the one the advertising points at.

Counting it produces facts the company does not state and no comparison site publishes. The most striking: in six jurisdictions, not one of the companies Dairyland lists has the word "Dairyland" in its name.

The disclosure that frames the whole thing is on Dairyland's underwriting companies page, read on 2 September 2026:

"Dairyland® brand property and casualty coverages are underwritten by one of these companies which are members of the Sentry Insurance Group, Stevens Point, WI."

That sentence is the same one The General carries, which is the subject of our pillar comparison, The General vs Dairyland. This page is about the list underneath it.

Eight companies wear the Dairyland name

The list names eight underwriting companies. The state-by-state section below it names which of them operate in each jurisdiction. Counting every jurisdiction against every company gives the following, which is our own tabulation rather than anything the source presents:

Underwriting company NAIC# Jurisdictions listed, of 51 Also named as an underwriter by The General?
Sentry Insurance Company 24988 51 No
Middlesex Insurance Company 23434 51 No
Dairyland Insurance Company 21164 45 No
Peak Property and Casualty Insurance Corporation 18139 40 No
Viking Insurance Company of Wisconsin 13137 34 Yes — named for California
Patriot General Insurance Company 23442 22 No
Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Company of Texas 26441 1 — Texas only Yes — named for Texas
Dairyland National Insurance Company 16623 1 — Wisconsin only No

Source: the underwriting company list published at dairylandinsurance.com, counted 2026-09-02, cross-referenced against the legal disclosures page at thegeneral.com read the same day. The page itself carries a form number, "Form ID = 54-863 WB", which is how this company versions a document.

Four readings the source does not offer:

Six jurisdictions get no company called Dairyland. In California, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Louisiana, New Jersey and Oklahoma, the companies listed are Sentry, Middlesex, Peak or Viking — none of them carrying the brand name on the advertisement. In those six places "Dairyland" is a trading name and nothing more. That is not concealed; it is simply only visible if you read the state list rather than the headline.

Two of the eight exist for one jurisdiction each. Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Company of Texas appears for Texas and nowhere else. Dairyland National Insurance Company appears for Wisconsin and nowhere else. Both are almost certainly artefacts of state-specific licensing rules rather than of anything a customer would notice, but they are the reason a driver in Texas and a driver in Wisconsin can hold the same brand and not the same carrier.

The choice narrows sharply in some states. Hawaii and New Jersey list two of the eight; Texas and Wisconsin list seven. The brand's presence is uniform in the marketing and is not uniform in the filings.

The overlap with The General now runs to two states, not one. Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Company of Texas appears on this list and is one of the two companies The General's legal disclosures page names for Texas. Viking Insurance Company of Wisconsin appears on this list too, and is one of the two companies the same page names for California — and Dairyland's own state list puts Viking in California. Quoting these two brands against each other in either state may produce two prices from one carrier. Our separate review of The General works through that page from the other direction.

The brand does write more than cars, which is a genuine and verifiable differentiator, though narrower than it is usually described. Its own motorcycle and off-road pages carry the same Sentry Insurance Group disclosure as the auto pages, and cover motorcycles, ATVs and UTVs, dirt bikes and snowmobiles under the same brand. RVs are the exception, and the way they are handled is worth spelling out, because reviews of this company routinely list RVs alongside motorcycles as a Dairyland product. They are not one. The site's own navigation data, present on every page read for this article, carries an entry labelled "Insurance - Vehicle - RV - Link" whose destination is not a Dairyland page at all but an outbound link to a third-party site, mylifeprotected.com/rv-insurance, with a Dairyland referral code appended to the URL. Renters insurance is routed to the same partner the same way. There is no RV or motorhome page on dairylandinsurance.com, and the sitemap lists no such section.

Its stablemate does the same thing and discloses it more plainly: The General's legal page says that "Motorhome, Travel Trailer, Boat, and Commercial Auto Insurance policies are offered and underwritten by Progressive Insurance," an insurer it describes as "a third-party insurer that is not affiliated with The General." So neither Sentry brand underwrites a recreational vehicle; both hand the enquiry to somebody else. If your SR-22 problem involves a bike rather than a motorhome, our guide to SR-22 insurance for motorcycle riders covers what changes.

The free filing is a default, not a term

Dairyland's best-known selling point is that it does not charge to file. It is true, it is stated by the company, and it is hedged three separate ways on a single page. From Dairyland's SR-22 page:

"At Dairyland, most often we file your SR22 for free as part of your policy."

"In most states, we can also send your SR22 to the state electronically the same day—and with no filing fee."

"Dairyland offers SR22s, usually for free as part of your insurance policy."

Most often. In most states. Usually. Three different hedges, three different sentences, same page. Read together they describe a default rather than a guarantee, and the difference matters at exactly the moment you are handed a quote. The company is not being evasive — it is being accurate about a national programme with state variations — but a review that reports "Dairyland files for free" without the qualifiers has dropped the part you need.

What makes the claim worth something anyway is the comparison the company itself draws in the next line: "Some companies and agencies might charge you additional fees or surcharges." That is a fair description of the alternative. The General, the other Sentry brand, publishes no amount at all and says only that "a filing fee or premium surcharge may be applied." So on this one point the two brands do differ in what they are willing to commit to in writing, and Dairyland commits to more. Ask for the filing charge as a separate line anyway, and ask whether it recurs at renewal, because "most often" is not "never."

The premium underneath the filing is a different matter, and there is no figure for it here. No insurer publishes a rate for an individual record, and an average drawn from other people's records is not an estimate of yours. There is also no star rating on this page, and it is worth saying where that decision came from rather than asserting it. Dairyland runs a customer reviews page of its own. Opened on 2 September 2026, it publishes no score and no review count: it describes customers "finding the cheap auto insurance, SR22 assistance, and quality motorcycle coverage they need" and then sends readers to Trustpilot, which it calls "a dependable third-party review site." So the company itself declines to put a number on its satisfaction. A rating without its sample size is not a measurement, and even one with a sample measures how a company treats the people it already has rather than what it will charge you.

For anything quantitative, the regulator is the source, not a review site. The Texas Department of Insurance publishes complaint data that, in its own description, includes "counts for confirmed complaints and policies in force by company name and line of coverage." The second half of that phrase is the whole point: a raw complaint count tells you which company is bigger, and a count set against policies in force is the only version that compares two carriers fairly. The NAIC Consumer Information Source does the equivalent nationally and tells users to "check your state's insurance department website to confirm the Company or HMO is licensed." Both lookups take a company name — which, given the table above, means the name on your quote, not the name on the advertisement.

It is also worth knowing what segment this is, in a regulator's words rather than a marketer's. The Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance — the home regulator of the group that owns this brand — defines the nonstandard market in its Consumer's Guide to Auto Insurance, PI-057 (R 07/2025), read through the Internet Archive capture of oci.wi.gov because the live host would not accept our connection. The category is "intended for drivers that insurance companies consider high-risk," and the guide lists who ends up in it: "drivers under the age of 25 with less driving experience, drivers with tickets or accidents, drivers with a poor premium payment history, and drivers with a reckless or drunk driving history." It adds that these drivers "usually have the highest rates." That is the honest frame for any claim that a nonstandard specialist is cheap for drivers under 25: the segment is defined by price going up, and only your own quote tells you where in it you land.

Same-day filing and the clock that actually counts

The speed claim is the other half of the brand's reputation, and the same page states it precisely: "We can help by issuing your SR22 right away and letting the state know you're covered—with no filing fee—and often within the same day of purchase."

That describes what the insurer does. It does not describe when you are legal to drive, which is a decision made by a state agency on its own timetable. Wisconsin's DMV publishes the other end of the pipe, read here through the Internet Archive capture of wisconsindot.gov after the live host refused our connection:

"The electronically filed information is usually entered automatically on the customer's driver record within one to two working days."

Same-day transmission plus one to two working days of processing is still fast. It is just not the same event, and if a court date or a reinstatement appointment is driving your timing, the state's number is the one to plan against.

That page also sets out two ways a same-day filing still fails, and both are about the document rather than the speed. First: "You must submit the actual SR22 certificate, we are unable to accept an insurance summary or other general proof of insurance." Second, on the certificate's wording, the phrase "All owned and non-owned automobiles" "is not acceptable" — the state requires the box indicating "All owned and non-owned (vehicles)" instead. A single word decides whether the filing is accepted.

This connects directly to something Dairyland gets right and states clearly. Its SR-22 page describes three certificate types: an Operator form "designed for drivers who borrow or rent a car, but don't own a car," an Owner form "for people who own and drive their own car," and an Operator/Owner combination form "for individuals who own their own car, but also borrow or rent one to drive occasionally." Which of those you buy determines which box is marked, and which box is marked determines whether Wisconsin accepts it. Getting the type right is a bigger risk than getting the price wrong, and it is why what an SR-22 actually is and whether an SR-22 covers any car you drive are worth reading before the quote rather than after. If you do not own a vehicle, the company confirms a non-owner SR-22 is available and describes it as "a secondary coverage that pays for damages above and beyond what might be covered through the car's primary insurance."

On moving states, Dairyland answers the question but hands the work back to you: "You'll need to contact your new state's DMV, and ensure the car insurance provider you use in your new state is able to file SR22s in your previous home state." That is the same constraint The General states as a limitation on itself, phrased as an instruction to the customer instead. Neither framing removes the problem, which is why moving to another state with an SR-22 is the hardest routine case in this area.

Finally, the cancellation warning, which the company puts plainly: "If your coverage lapses, your insurance company is required to inform the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)," and "If you no longer need an SR22, an SR-26 form is also filed to remove the SR22." Free filing does nothing for you if a missed payment triggers the SR-26 instead.

What I could not verify

Whether the state-by-state list is complete or current. The page carries no revision date and no "as of" line. The counts above are ours, taken from the page as it stood on 2 September 2026, and they will drift as licences change. The count, not the conclusion, is the thing to re-run.

Which of the eight companies would issue your policy. The list says which operate in your state; it does not say which one you get. In a state listing five or six of them, that is decided at quote time.

Complaint indexes or licensing status for any of the eight. The NAIC and state department lookups run as database queries rather than as fixed, citable pages, so no figure from them is reproduced here. The method is above and the NAIC numbers in the table are what those lookups take.

Any premium, and any satisfaction rating. No insurer publishes a rate for an individual record, so none appears. No rating appears either: the company's own reviews page carries neither a score nor a review count and defers to a third-party site, and no rating published with a sample size attached to it was found on any source this site will cite.

What the RV referral partner actually sells, or on what terms. The link exists in Dairyland's navigation and leads off-site with a referral code. Nothing about the resulting product is underwritten or disclosed by Dairyland, so nothing about it is described here.

Whether "free filing" ever fails in practice. The company's own hedges — "most often", "usually", "in most states" — imply exceptions exist. Which states or circumstances they cover is not published, and asking at quote time is the only way to find out.

Whether PI-057 covers SR-22 filings. It does not. The guide was read in full and contains no mention of SR-22 or SR22 certificates; it is cited here only for the nonstandard market definition. Wisconsin's SR-22 rules sit with the DMV page cited above.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Dairyland charge to file an SR-22? Usually not, and the company says so itself — but note how carefully. Its SR-22 page says "At Dairyland, most often we file your SR22 for free as part of your policy" and, separately, "Dairyland offers SR22s, usually for free as part of your insurance policy," and, on same-day electronic filing, that this applies "in most states." Three hedges on one page describe a default rather than a contractual term, so treat free filing as the expected outcome and still ask for the filing charge as a separate line on your quote, including whether it recurs at renewal.

Who actually underwrites a Dairyland policy? One of eight companies, all members of the Sentry Insurance Group, and which one depends on your state. Counting the company's own state-by-state list on 2 September 2026, Sentry Insurance Company and Middlesex Insurance Company appear in all 51 jurisdictions, Dairyland Insurance Company in 45, Peak Property and Casualty in 40, Viking Insurance Company of Wisconsin in 34 and Patriot General in 22, while Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Company of Texas appears for Texas alone and Dairyland National Insurance Company for Wisconsin alone. In California, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Louisiana, New Jersey and Oklahoma, none of the listed companies has "Dairyland" in its name at all.

Is Dairyland the same company as The General? They are separate brands underwritten by the same group, and in two states the overlap goes further than the group. Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Company of Texas is on Dairyland's published list and is also one of the two companies The General names as its Texas underwriter; Viking Insurance Company of Wisconsin is on Dairyland's list, including for California, and is also one of the two companies The General names for California. The practical consequence is that in those two states a quote from each brand is not necessarily two quotes from two carriers, so put at least one insurer from outside the Sentry group on your shortlist.

Does Dairyland cover motorcycles and RVs alongside the SR-22? Motorcycles yes, RVs no. Its motorcycle and off-road pages carry the same Sentry Insurance Group underwriting disclosure as the car pages and cover motorcycles, ATVs and UTVs, dirt bikes and snowmobiles, so a bike and a car can sit with one company and one filing conversation. RVs are different: there is no RV or motorhome page on dairylandinsurance.com, and the RV entry in the site's own navigation is an outbound link to a third-party site with a Dairyland referral code in the URL. The RV claim that circulates in reviews of this company treats a referral link as a product. Its stablemate is in the same position and says so on its legal page: motorhome, travel trailer, boat and commercial auto policies there are underwritten by Progressive, "a third-party insurer that is not affiliated with The General."

How fast will the SR-22 actually reach my state? Faster than average, but the insurer's clock and the state's clock are different things. Dairyland says it can issue the certificate "right away" and send it electronically "often within the same day of purchase." Wisconsin's DMV, in the state where this group is based, says electronically filed information "is usually entered automatically on the customer's driver record within one to two working days," will not accept "an insurance summary or other general proof of insurance" in place of the actual certificate, and rejects the wording "All owned and non-owned automobiles" outright. Plan around the state's timetable, and check that the certificate type matches the one your state expects.

Sources for this guide

This guide is not about a single state, so its sources are the statutes, agency pages and company pages that state each thing it claims, each with the date I read it. Comparison sites are not listed here: where this guide reports a figure one of them published, the text names it as a reported figure rather than presenting it as evidence.

  • Dairyland - SR-22 insuranceread on 2026-08-19

    The company page for the product being reviewed. Primary source for what Dairyland says it offers, not for whether it is a good buy.

  • NAIC Consumer Information Source - complaints by carrierread on 2026-08-20

    Regulator data rather than another publisher opinion: look the carrier up by name and see the complaints filed against it. It publishes no prices, which is why this page does not either.

By Alonso Pinar Jiménez · Editor

Alonso Pinar Jiménez writes ClearRoad Guide. He is a web developer, not an insurance agent or a lawyer. On the state guides, legal requirements come from the state agency that sets them, linked to the page that says it and dated. Every dollar amount on this site is a statutory limit or a fee the agency itself publishes; no premium figures appear here, because no insurer publishes a rate for an individual record. Where two sources disagree, both are shown with their origin instead of averaged into a number nobody confirmed. See the Editorial Policy for how this site is researched, verified, and updated, and How This Site Is Made for how it was written.

Published July 31, 2026 · Last updated September 2, 2026

Corrections and withdrawn figures on this site are recorded, dated, in the corrections log.